FOCUS COLUMN
By Bradford B. Kuhn and K. Erik Friess California courts have traditionally displayed little interest in holding cities and other government agencies liable for damages when those agencies over-regulate property. But the California Court of Appeal recently took an unusual interest, holding that a city's moratorium limiting development on unstable property constitutes a regulatory taking, potentially requiring the city to pay the land...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In