This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 16, 2008

Getting Reorganized

There are several reasons why a committee and its counsel are better served by the extra protection of an exculpation clause in a confirmed plan than by the implicit meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, write David J. Richardson and Justin E. Rawlins. - Focus Column

FOCUS COLUMN

By David J. Richardson and Justin E. Rawlins

Many reported opinions in recent years have held that Section 1103(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, which lists the duties of official committees of unsecured creditors, implicitly includes a grant of immunity for committee members against claims arising from actions taken in the course of carrying out such duties, except those arising from willful misconduct or ultra vires acts. Most of these r...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up