This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Family

May 4, 2006

Ruling Guides Parents on Legal Conundrum of Moving a Child

Focus Column - By Mitchell A. Jacobs and David L. Marcus - In its most recent child custody move-away case, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage of Brown & Yana, 37 Cal. App. 4th 947 (2006), addressed two important issues.

Focus Column

By Mitchell A. Jacobs and David L. Marcus
     
      In its most recent child custody move-away case, the California Supreme Court in In re Marriage of Brown & Yana, 37 Cal. App. 4th 947 (2006), addressed two important issues. The court first held that a parent with sole legal and physical custody does not have the absolute right to move with the child. Second, the court ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up