This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jun. 1, 2006

High Court Will Resolve Whether Proposition 64 Is Retroactive

Focus Column - By Kimberly A. Kralowec - Today, the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in two cases involving whether Proposition 64, which passed in November 2004, applies retroactively to pending Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professional Code Section 17200 et seq.) actions.

Focus Column

By Kimberly A. Kralowec
     

      Today, the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in two cases involving whether Proposition 64, which passed in November 2004, applies retroactively to pending Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professional Code Section 17200 et seq.) actions. Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, S131798; Branick v. Downey Sav. &...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up