This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Feb. 21, 2015

Ethics opinion explores how to withdraw without revealing client confidences

Attorneys caught between an ethical demand to withdraw from a case and a court order to disclose the confidential reasons must do the best they can, a new State Bar ethics opinion concludes.


By Don J. DeBenedictis


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Sometimes, an attorney just needs to get out of a case. Maybe a conflict of interest crops up or the client announces a plan to do something illegal. Maybe it's a matter of not being paid.


Typically, the judge will allow the attorney to withdraw. But now and then, the judge wants to know why. If the explanation requires disclosing client confidences, the judge's order poses a very big p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up