This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Mar. 18, 2000

Rapid Disclosure

Rapid Disclosure Northern District of California Procedures for Markman Hearings By Guy W. Chambers The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments Inc. , 116 S.Ct. 1384 (1996), has dramatically transformed patent litigation in the United States. Essentially, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the interpretation of patent claims is now an issue of law for a trial judge, not a jury, to decide.

By Guy W. Chambers
        The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments Inc., 116 S.Ct. 1384 (1996), has dramatically transformed patent litigation in the United States. Essentially, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the interpretation of patent claims is now an issue of law for a trial judge, not a jury, to decide. Patent claims, found at the end of the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)