This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Nov. 15, 2007

Capital Offense

Forum Column - By Kent Scheidegger - An upcoming Supreme Court case should make clear that having a slightly below-par attorney can't be enough to overturn the death penalty for a convicted murderer.

FORUM COLUMN

By Kent Scheidegger

      Should the conviction of an indisputably guilty murderer, entered after a fair trial, be overturned because a better lawyer would have cut a deal? On Nov. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court, sua sponte, asked for briefing of that question when it accepted the case of Arave v. Hoffman. The case lies at the intersection of two problematic areas of the law: plea bargaining and ineffective ass...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up