FORUM COLUMN
By Kent Scheidegger
Should the conviction of an indisputably guilty murderer, entered after a fair trial, be overturned because a better lawyer would have cut a deal? On Nov. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court, sua sponte, asked for briefing of that question when it accepted the case of Arave v. Hoffman. The case lies at the intersection of two problematic areas of the law: plea bargaining and ineffective ass...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In