This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Large Firms

Aug. 13, 2009

Heller Finances Scared Off Merger Mates

A source revealed the reason behind the collapse of merger negotiations between Heller Ehrman and three separate law firms last year: shady accounting practices.

By Jill Redhage
Daily Journal Staff Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - Before Heller Ehrman dissolved last year, it tried out mergers with Winston & Strawn, Baker & McKenzie and, finally, Mayer Brown. Negotiations collapsed in every case. One source familiar with the details of those merger negotiations on Tuesday disclosed those firms' reasons for leaving Heller at the altar: Both Winston and Baker and possibly Mayer Brown balked at acquiring the firm after learning...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up