This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 6, 2009

On Your Marks: The Rules on False Patent Marking Are Murky

Case law on how to assess patent false marking offenses is sparse, writes Michelle Porter.

By Michelle Porter

Parties to false marking suits may encounter challenges in determining what constitutes a false marking offense, given limited and what can be viewed as inconsistent - if not contradictory - case law on the matter.

False marking cases are brought against firms or individuals believed to have affixed a patent number or the word "patent" to a product that is not covered by the marked patent. Cases also can be broug...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up