This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Aug. 5, 2009

Reasonable Doubt About Reasonable Doubt

Instructions on the "reasonable doubt" standard can be ambiguous and confusing, writes Dean D. Pregerson.

FORUM COLUMN

By Dean D. Pregerson

Every American juror - indeed, every watcher of American crime dramas on television - knows how a criminal jury trial ends: The judge reads to the jury an instruction stating that the defendant is presumed innocent unless the government produces evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Afterward, the jurors deliberate and deliver their verdict. In my courtroom, I usually read the 9th Circuit's Model Instructio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up