This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 26, 2010

Interest for Thee but Not for Me?

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide an obscure issue of appellate procedure. Learn about the clash of two cases that piqued the Court's interest. By John A. Taylor Jr. of Horvitz & Levy.

By John A. Taylor Jr.

Your small family-owned construction company is hit with a verdict of $100,000 - less than one-sixth of what plaintiffs originally sought - but the trial court then awards plaintiffs over $680,000 in costs and fees. You appeal the fee award, persuade the Court of Appeal to reverse it, and are awarded your costs on appeal, to be determined by the trial court on remand.

One of your largest costs on appeal arose from the $...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up