This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Aug. 17, 2010

San Francisco Has Some Explaining To Do

San Francisco's practice of providing preferential treatment for city contract awards based on race and gender faces the ultimate test, by Randy Parent of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

By Randy Parent

On Aug. 2, 2010, the state Supreme Court issued a decision in the long-running Proposition 209 challenge to the city and county of San Francisco ordinance that provides preferential treatment in the award of city contracts based on race and gender. Coral Construction v. City and County of San Francisco 2010 S.O.S. 4449. The court rejected two of the city's three arguments against the Proposition 209 challenge and remanded the ca...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up