This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Aug. 13, 2010

No More Kicking and Screaming

The Supreme Court has restored order in a debate about whether properly made evidence objections are waived on appeal, by Gary A. Watt of Archer Norris.

By Gary A. Watt

Mercifully, the Supreme Court has ended the summary judgment evidence ruling waiver debate. The waiver issue arose out of Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank (1st Dist. 1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1410, Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center (1993) 6 Cal.4th 666 and Sharon P. v. Arman Ltd. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 1181. Last week, in Reid v. Google Inc. 2010 Cal. LEXIS 7544, the Supreme Court held that as long as evid...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up