In yesterday's first part commentary on the recent MacKay v. Superior Court ruling, we underscored the fact that Proposition 103 subjects auto and home insurers to intense scrutiny by the California Department of Insurance and that companies face harsh sanctions for any violation of rating laws - and that the MacKay ruling does not impact Proposition 103, but merely shuts off the attorney fee spigot. Today'...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In