Litigation
Nov. 26, 2015
Third hearing on class size in Uber driver's suit yields little progress
At a hearing Wednesday in a potentially precedent setting case for the gig economy the defense attorney representing Uber put forward what at times appeared to be a counterintuitive set of arguments, saying the class of drivers suing the on-demand ride service provider deserved a better representative




Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - At a hearing Wednesday in a potentially precedent-setting case, the defense attorney representing Uber Technologies Inc. put forward what at times appeared to be an unusual argument that the class of drivers suing the on-demand ride service provider deserved a better representative.
Uber's attorney Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, argued again...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In