Transportation,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jun. 2, 2017
The Drone Slayer and private property
Earlier this year, a federal court dismissed a lawsuit brought by a drone pilot against a Kentucky man who shot down a drone that he thought was being used to spy on his teenage daughter at home.
Joshua M. Briones
Managing Member
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Litigation
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3100
Los Angeles , CA 90067
Phone: (310) 226-7887
Email: jbriones@mintz.com
UCLA Law School
Esteban Morales Fabila
Associate
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Litigation
2029 Century Park E Ste 1370
Los Angeles , Ca 90067
Phone: (310) 226-7841
Fax: (310) 586-3202
Email: emorales@mintz.com
Natalie Prescott
Associate
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
Litigation
3580 Carmel Mountain Rd # 300
San Diego , CA 92130
Phone: (858) 314-1534
Email: NAPrescott@mintz.com
Duke Univ Law School
Earlier this year, a federal court in Kentucky dismissed a lawsuit brought by a drone pilot against the "Drone Slayer." The case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, leaving open questions of interplay between aerial trespass and the scope of federal authority.
In 2015, the slayer, a Kentucky man, shot down a drone that he thought was flying over his property and was being used to spy on his teenage daughter. The drone pilot sued the slayer in federal court, seeking declaratory r...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In