This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

International Law,
Corporate,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.

May 24, 2017

One NAFTA reform that all sides should be able to agree on

President Trump can put America's Constitution first by removing Chapter 19 from NAFTA.

Julian Ku

Maurice A. Deane Professor of Constitutional Law
Hofstra University

Julian Ku is a co-founder of the international law blog OpinioJuris.org and a contributing editor to Lawfareblog.com

See more...

The Trump administration's decision to seek changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement has caused great concern and trepidation among its many supporters. But while there is much worth preserving in NAFTA, there is one provision that both supporters and critics of NAFTA should agree to eliminate: the use of unreviewable, unaccountable and unconstitutional international tribunals to review the application of U.S. trade law governing antidumping and countervailing duties.

U.S....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up