Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court,
Appellate Practice
May 22, 2017
Parsing protected activity
In its latest anti-SLAPP case, the state high court recently wrestled with whether the statute should apply to all government actions "arising from" protected communications.
Sarah Hofstadter
Of Counsel
California Appellate Law Group LLP
96 Jessie Street
San Francisco , California 94105
Phone: (415) 649-6700
Email: sarah@calapplaw.com
Stanford Univ Law School
Sarah Hofstadter is of counsel with the California Appellate Law Group LLP, an appellate boutique based in San Francisco. She spent more than a dozen years as a research and staff attorney for jurists on the California Courts of Appeal and the 9th Circuit. Find out more about Sarah and the California Appellate Law Group LLP at www.calapplaw.com
APPELLATE ZEALOTS
Decided only weeks ago by the California Supreme Court, Park v. Board of Trustees of California State Univ., 2017 DJDAR 4232 (May 4, 2017), may be the most important case to define the way California's anti-SLAPP statute applies to government entities since its enactment in 1992. In Park, the court unanimously, definitively and elegantly answered a complex question that reaches the core of the anti-SLAPP sta...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In