Law Practice,
Appellate Practice
May 8, 2017
No anti-SLAPP jurisdiction, no problem
The California Supreme Court had an opportunity to wrestle with ancient Greek paradoxes in a unique anti-SLAPP/attorney discipline case.
Charles M. Kagay
Of Counsel
Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP
Appellate Law (Certified)
96 Jessie Street
San Francisco , CA 94105
Phone: (415) 649-6700
Fax: (415) 362-1431
Email: charles.kagay@calg.com
Harvard Law School
Charles has decades of experience handling appeals that involve complex or novel legal questions and is certified by the State Bar as a California appellate specialist. Find out more about Charles and the Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP at www.calg.com. Appellate Zealots is a monthly column on recent appellate decisions and appellate issues written by the attorneys of the Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP.
APPELLATE ZEALOTS
The California Supreme Court probably does not get many opportunities to wrestle with ancient Greek paradoxes. It has plenty to handle with contemporary conundrums, such as those arising under California's anti-SLAPP statute. But in its recent decision Barry v. State Bar of California, 2 Cal. 5th 318 (2017), the court had occasion to do both.
Consider what has been called the "Paradox of the Court." Quite a lo...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In