This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Video

Mar. 1, 2013

VIDEO: Impact of high court's 'mixed-motive' opinion uncertain

Neither employers nor the plaintiffs' bar perceives Harris' mixed-motive decision as a "big win," and it remains to be seen how the ruling will affect the decision whether to settle a case or go to trial. By Fraser McAlpine


By Fraser A. McAlpine


The state Supreme Court's decision in Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 2013 DJDAR 1771 (Feb. 7), will alter the dynamic in many employment discrimination cases.


In its decision, the Supreme Court made two holdings that on the surface appear contradictory:


(1) A plaintiff can establish a claim of employment discrimination by showing that discrimination was a substantial motivating factor in the decision-making pr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up