This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor & Employment

Jul. 17, 2013

Karen J. Kubin

Morrison & Foerster LLP San Francisco Specialty: class action litigation


By and large, Kubin said the courts are "getting it right" in light of the landmark state Supreme Court ruling last year that established guidelines for employee meal and rest breaks.


That long-awaited decision grew out of a lawsuit brought against her client, Brinker Restaurant Corp., and affirmed that employers are only obligated to provide meal periods to their employees, but don't have to ensure that they take them. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up