This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Jun. 11, 2013

Plaintiffs in Google data collection case attack company's dismissal argument

Lawyers for Google Inc. and opposing counsel eager to sue over the company's secretive data collection venture struggled with the definition of "radio communication" before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - Lawyers for Google Inc. and opposing counsel eager to sue over the company's secretive data collection venture struggled with the definition of "radio communication" before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday. A three-judge panel, led by Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee, appeared uncertain how to interpret a case that came on the court's calendar just as data mining by the go...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up