This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 10, 2013

Oprah's trademark woes provide cautionary tale

Being tertiary and often descriptive in nature, catch phrases may not be searched and cleared in the usual trademark approval process of many companies. By Richard Kirkpatrick and Laura Gustafson


By Richard Kirkpatrick and Laura Gustafson


A trademark "trap for the unwary" is spotlighted by a May 31 opinion by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Kelly-Brown v Oprah Winfrey, 2013 WL 2360999 (2d Cir 2013).


The practical problem illustrated by the case is the very common use in advertising of short phrases in connection with primary or secondary brands. Such "catch phrases" are often intended not to function as permanen...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up