By Rebecca Beyer
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A federal judge on Friday heard arguments and debated with attorneys about whether the taking of someone's DNA upon a felony arrest violates the Constitution.
At issue is a 2004 law passed by California voters that requires a DNA sample from anyone arrested on suspicion of a felony, regardless of whether they are ever charged with or convicted of a crime. The provision of the law ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In