This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

May 24, 2013

U.S. needs to provide more specifics when denying a visa, 9th Circuit rules

U.S. officials must give explicit reasons - not merely cite a vague anti-terrorism statute - for denying a visa to the Afghan husband of a U.S. citizen wife, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel held Thursday.


security cases, "it cannot be that Din's constitutional right to review is a right only to a rubber-stamp on the Government's vague and conclusory assertion of inadmissibility."


Dissenting, Circuit Judge Richard R. Clifton wrote that nondisclosure of the reasons for barring Berashk was essential because of "this nation's desire to keep persons connected with terrorist activities from entering the country."


Murguia, hersel...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up