This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 21, 2013

One-way fee shifting proves risky

Civil Code Section 1717, which makes one-way fee-shifting provisions mutual in actions on the contract, will not save such a provision if the action sounds in tort. By Gerald G. Knapton and Kim Karelis


By Gerald G. Knapton and Kim Karelis


We have seen a growing number of rather draconian and very broadly worded attorney fees clauses that are one-sided, and as we read these provisions we have had in the backs of our minds the savings effect of Civil Code Section 1717(a) which makes such fee shifting mutual to the "prevailing party." We have therefore felt that since each side had the same potential exposure, why worry? However, a recent opinio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up