This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental

Mar. 21, 2013

Beware CERCLA statutory pitfalls

Last week, the 9th Circuit affirmed a decision which affects environmental insurers and, perhaps inconspicuously, also impacts those who agree to be indemnitors for environmental contamination. By Christopher Smith and Steven Hoch


By Christopher W. Smith and Steven L. Hoch


Last week, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision which affects environmental insurers and, perhaps inconspicuously, also impacts those who agree to be indemnitors for environmental contamination. The district court decision which was affirmed dismissed a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability (CERCLA) cost recovery claim brought by an environmental insurer because, inter...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up