This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 18, 2013

Obama administration's surveillance program faces hurdle

In a setback for the Obama administration's surveillance program, a federal judge here on Friday held unconstitutional the use of so-called National Security Letters, in part because they come with gag orders that forbid recipients from dis


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - In a setback for the Obama administration's domestic surveillance program, a federal judge on Friday held that the use of so-called national security letters was unconstitutional, in part because they come with gag orders that forbid recipients from discussing them.


The gag orders violate free speech rights, U.S. District Judge Susan Y. Illston ruled. She ordered the Federal Bureau ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up