This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 18, 2013

SIR decision favors insureds

An insurance policy's unsatisfied self-insured retention can significantly impact litigation and impede an injured party's recovery or risk transfer efforts. By Brandon T. Kerr


By Brandon T. Kerr


"I can't get no satisfaction," sang Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones. This rock classic was released in 1965 and was written by Jagger and band mate Keith Richards. When the legendary duo wrote of "satisfaction," I doubt they had a self-insured retention (SIR) in mind. But an insurance policy's unsatisfied SIR can significantly impact litigation and impede an injured party's recovery or risk transfer efforts. Wi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up