Mar. 15, 2013
Choice of law under the governmental interest approach
Simply filing a case in California does not automatically mean the applicable legal authority is California.
Brian S. Kabateck
Founding and Managing Partner
Kabateck LLP
Consumer rights
633 W. Fifth Street Suite 3200
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: 213-217-5000
Email: bsk@kbklawyers.com
Brian represents plaintiffs in personal injury, mass torts litigation, class actions, insurance bad faith, insurance litigation and commercial contingency litigation. He is a former president of Consumer Attorneys of California.
Doug Rochen
Partner
DiCello Levitt, LLP
Email: drochen@dicellolevitt.com
California Western School of Law
Simply filing a case in California does not automatically mean the applicable legal authority is California. Even if personal jurisdiction is attainable and venue is deemed proper, certain challenges may still arise when the parties to a lawsuit hail from different sovereign states, and/or the accident occurred out-of-state. When the court is faced with these circumstances, an often challenging analysis must be performed to determine what law applies. In making this determination, the Ca...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In