This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Labor/Employment

Mar. 15, 2013

9th Circuit corruption ruling may affect other employment cases

A 9th Circuit ruling on a claim of corruption against BNSF Railway Company by a rail workers union grabbed the attention of California employment attorneys, who say employers often have undue financial influence over arbitrators.


By Laura Hautala


Daily Journal Staff Writer


A federal appellate court ruling on a corruption claim against BNSF Railway Co. by a Washington State rail workers' union this week grabbed the attention of California employment attorneys, who say the decision could affect other cases involving parties making quid pro quo statements in arbitration.


The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal on Wednesday gave the United Transportation Union another ch...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up