This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 14, 2013

Section 1030 'pay to play' rules a shock to some foreign clients

When I tell a foreign company that it may be required to file an undertaking in an amount equal to what the defendant reasonably expects to incur in costs and fees, I usually get a blank stare of disbelief. By Jason Kim


By Jason Kim


Many of my clients are foreign companies (mostly from Asia) doing business or investing in the U.S. Some have been in the U.S. market for a while and are therefore quite familiar with U.S. litigation. (My guess is that hard lessons learned on the battle field are not easily forgotten.) However, even such veterans of U.S. litigation are often surprised by the quirkiness of California litigation. One unexpected quirk is the motion for filing of underta...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up