This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Nov. 12, 2012

High court case could change IP litigation strategies

Although the question presented is stated in terms of trademarks, the holding in this case will clearly be applicable to patent and copyright suits. By Ted Sichelman of the University of San Diego School of Law


By Ted Sichelman


Although Already LLC v. Nike, Inc. is nominally a trademark case, the case ultimately turns upon important jurisdictional issues that could have wide impact within and outside the IP world. The facts are straightforward. Nike sued Already for trademark infringement and dilution for the sale of athletic shoes. Already defended in part by claiming the mark was invalid and not infringed, and also sought a declaratory judgment on these grounds...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up