This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Nov. 7, 2012

In developing employment lawsuits, Brinker brings clarity

The Brinker decision has helped plaintiffs' attorneys hone their allegations against three particular employer behaviors: automatically deducted lunch breaks, rounding of workers' hours, and the lack of seating for cashiers.


By Laura Hautala


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Since the state Supreme Court decided a much anticipated wage-and-hour case in April, business owners in California have enjoyed some clarity on when and how to provide meal and rest breaks to their employees. But lawyers say it hasn't stemmed the tide of employment class actions alleging missed breaks, unpaid wages and denied rights.


In fact, attorneys say, the Brinker Restaurant Corp. d...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up