Labor & Employment
Jul. 18, 2012
Karen J. Kubin
Morrison & Foerster LLP San Francisco Specialty: class actions, retail
One of her biggest recent achievements dealt with the question of whether employers were obligated simply to provide meal periods or to ensure that meal periods are taken.
In a landmark decision, the state Supreme Court in April ruled in favor of Kubin's position - that employers are generally not obligated to ensure that workers actually take their required breaks. ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In