This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Commercial Law

Dec. 13, 2011

Pre-purchase exposure: Defeating class certification in false advertising cases

With social media and new ad avenues, the variability of consumer exposure may defeat class certification. By Gregory J. Sater of Venable


By Gregory J. Sater


How can defendants in California defeat class certification in class actions that allege false advertising under either the "fraudulent" prong of the unfair-competition law or the Consumer Legal Remedies Act? There is at least one good way to do so, and that is by demonstrating variability of consumer exposure to the challenged advertising claim.


While there are differences between these two statutes, both require the plain...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up