This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Nov. 30, 2011

Hotfile v. Warner Bros.: Is there a slim chance for redemption?

The Hotfile lawsuit raises the question of whether intentional misuse of copyright tackdown notices is a punishable offense. By Nickolas B. Solish


By Nickolas B. Solish


A previous version of this story misstated that some of the false takedowns were made intentionally. Hotfile alleges, and Warner Bros. denies, that any of these takedowns were intentional. The Daily Journal regrets the error.


Who is to blame when both sides don't play fair? This is the prevailing question in the Hotfile lawsuit.


After Hotfile was sued by several major movie studios, it filed a counterclaim accus...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up