This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 2, 2011

Class certification of punitive damages claims post-Wal-mart v. Dukes

The decision in Wal-mart could restrict federal court authority to certify punitive damages. By Felix Shafir of Horvitz & Levy LLP


By Felix Shafir


For years, plaintiffs and defendants have clashed over whether claims for punitive damages can be certified for class treatment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b). But the legal landscape on which this conflict has raged may well have shifted. The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), could circumscribe federal courts' authority to certify punitive damages claim...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up