This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor & Employment

Jul. 13, 2011

Editor's Note

With two cases this year - AT&T v. Concepcion and Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - the U.S. Supreme Court appears to have altered class action litigation for the foreseeable future.


With two cases this year - AT&T v. Concepcion and Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. - the U.S. Supreme Court appears to have altered class action litigation for the foreseeable future. Experts say employment cases are most likely to see the full impact of this shift. Lawyers practicing in the field of labor and employment can expect to see many more (but perhaps much smaller) cases than ever before.


Perhaps soon, the state Supreme Court will weigh ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up