This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Sep. 15, 2010

EU: No Privilege for In-House Lawyers

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on Tuesday that in-house counsel correspondence with clients doesn't qualify for attorney-client privilege in antitrust matters.

By Jill Redhage

Daily Journal Staff Writer

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on Tuesday that in-house counsel's correspondence with clients doesn't qualify for attorney-client privilege in antitrust matters, thwarting corporate counsel attempts to bring privilege policies in Europe in line with those in U.S. courts.

The ruling brings to a close seven years' worth of efforts by U.K.-based Akzo Nobel C...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up