This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 16, 2009

The Judicial Mind

In the calculations of the judicial mind there is an evolving sense of how and when the Constitution should be reinterpreted to improve people's lives, writes Bruce J. Einhorn.

FORUM COLUMN

By Bruce J. Einhorn

As the Senate confirmation hearings continue on President Obama's nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, it seems appropriate to consider what should inform the content of a judge's deliberative process. Since federal judges and Supreme Court justices serve for life and thus render decisions for generations to come and for an ever changing political, economic and social order, their methods and habits ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up