This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 3, 2010

Why the Proposed New Rules of Professional Conduct Should Be Rejected

This third installment criticizing the proposed new Rules of Professional Conduct focuses on the overexpansion of informed client consent, by Kurt W. Melchior of Nossaman and Jerome Sapiro Jr. of The Sapiro Law Firm.

By Kurt W. Melchior and Jerome Sapiro Jr.

We continue our critical analysis of the proposed new rules of Professional Conduct. Today we will devote much of our discussion to the concept of informed client consent: a noble and at times necessary tool of the profession, but one which we believe the Commission has expanded beyond levels that allow a reasonable practice of the law on our clients' behalf.

One justification for...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up