This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 2, 2010

Why the Proposed New Rules of Professional Conduct Should Be Rejected

This second installment in opposition criticizes the proposed new Rules of Professional Conduct as suffering from wordiness and vagueness, by Kurt W. Melchior of Nossaman and Jerome Sapiro Jr. of The Sapiro Law Firm.

By Kurt W. Melchior and Jerome Sapiro Jr.

In our last segment, we introduced the subject of the Rules revisions and described the closeness of the votes on many controversial issues. We continue with a discussion of the new Rules' vagueness and wordiness.

Because they are disciplinary rules, our current rules establish bright line tests for permissible or impermissible behavior. The new rules often do not. Instead, they a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up