This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Jun. 22, 2009

Guilty by Association?

A recent Supreme Court decision invites plaintiffs and prosecutors to up the stakes in a wide variety of cases by alleging RICO violations, write Martha Boersch and Caroline Mitchell.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Martha Boersch and Caroline Mitchell

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent 7-2 decision in Boyle v. United States, 2009 DJDAR 8227, resolved a three-way split among the circuits about what proof of "structure" is required to establish an "association-in-fact" enterprise under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. The decision rejected the dissent's view that courts should require a business-like structure before ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up