By Curt Cutting
How much do we really care about the public's confidence in an impartial judiciary? That is the essence of the question facing the California Supreme Court in People v. Freeman, which was argued earlier this month. If the questions asked at oral argument are any indication, the court may be poised to rule that the appearance of judicial bias is not enough to overturn a judgment, and that the aggrieved party must provide some evidence that the...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In