This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Nov. 23, 2009

Keeping Up Appearances

Curt Cutting of Horvitz & Levy looks at People v. Freeman and whether the appearance of judicial bias is enough to overturn a judgment.

By Curt Cutting

How much do we really care about the public's confidence in an impartial judiciary? That is the essence of the question facing the California Supreme Court in People v. Freeman, which was argued earlier this month. If the questions asked at oral argument are any indication, the court may be poised to rule that the appearance of judicial bias is not enough to overturn a judgment, and that the aggrieved party must provide some evidence that the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up