FAMILY
By Stacy Phillips, Karnig Greg Dukmajian and Jacqueline ShaprowInstead of engaging in legal fiction, the court in Niko v. Foreman, 144 Cal.App. 4th 344 (2006) should have endeavored to create new law. Perhaps the answer is not to jettison the "change of circumstances" rule, but to make the rule less restrictive in move-away cases in which the parents have an equal or nearly equal custodial timeshare arrangement. One way to accomp...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In