This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Jul. 14, 2009

Defensive Plays

A recent appellate court decision will likely result in more insurance coverage disputes in mixed actions where some claims are potentially covered, some not, writes Joan M. Cotkin.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Joan Cotkin

In a recent California Appellate court decision, State Farm General Insurance Company v. Mimin Mintarsih, 2009 DJDAR 9471, 2nd District Justice Walter Croskey wrote an opinion that epitomizes the maxim that bad facts make for bad law, or at least in this case, confusing law. In the underlying case, the insureds, Dennis and Dina Lam, were very unlovely people who were accused of imprisoning a domestic servant, Mim...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up