FOCUS COLUMN
By Melanie M. Poturica and Lauren C. Liebes The pool of potential retaliation claimants under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 just got smaller in many jurisdictions. The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals joins the 3rd, 5th and 8th Circuits in its recent holding that a claimant must personally engage in protected activity, such as opposing a practice, making a charge or assisting or participating in an investigation, in order to ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In