By Lawrence Hurley
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - Back in December, the nine black-robed justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had an unusual experience during a routine oral argument: Both of the arguing counsel abandoned the reasoning of the federal appeals court ruling under scrutiny. The circuit court in question was the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. It was a moment that, in a sense, encapsulated the 9th C...
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - Back in December, the nine black-robed justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had an unusual experience during a routine oral argument: Both of the arguing counsel abandoned the reasoning of the federal appeals court ruling under scrutiny. The circuit court in question was the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. It was a moment that, in a sense, encapsulated the 9th C...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In