U.S. Supreme Court
Jun. 30, 2009
Court's Lab Ruling Vacates California Appellate Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court vacated a California 2nd District Court of Appeal ruling Monday in light of its decision last week requiring laboratory technicians to testify in person if asked to by the defense.
By Lawrence Hurley
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court vacated a California 2nd District Court of Appeal ruling Monday in light of the high court's decision last week to require laboratory technicians to testify in person if asked to by the defense. Convicted murderer Antonio Barba now has an opportunity to argue for a retrial so that he can cross-examine the technician who carried out an analysis on DNA that linked him...
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court vacated a California 2nd District Court of Appeal ruling Monday in light of the high court's decision last week to require laboratory technicians to testify in person if asked to by the defense. Convicted murderer Antonio Barba now has an opportunity to argue for a retrial so that he can cross-examine the technician who carried out an analysis on DNA that linked him...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In